Module 2

 



MODULE 2
Bloom's Taxonomy
Writing Objectives
WebQuests are based on the ideas of inquiry, constructivism, and cooperative and collaborative learning

Bloom's Taxonomy
(Bloom's Taxonomy)

Thinking Skills - WebQuests use all levels of Blooms Taxonomy.
In creating a WebQuest students use lower to higher order
thinking skills
.

Blooms Taxonomy
Competence
Skills Demonstrated
Knowledge
  • observation and recall of information
    knowledge of dates, events, places
    knowledge of major ideas
    mastery of subject matter

    .
Comprehension
  • understanding information
    grasp meaning
    translate knowledge into new context
    interpret facts, compare, contrast
    order, group, infer causes
    predict consequences
Application
  • use information
    use methods, concepts, theories in new situations
    solve problems using required skills or knowledge
Analysis
  • seeing patterns
    organization of parts
    recognition of hidden meanings
    identification of components
Synthesis
  • use old ideas to create new ones
    generalize from given facts
    relate knowledge from several areas
    predict, draw conclusions
Evaluation
  • compare and discriminate between ideas
    assess value of theories, presentations
    make choices based on reasoned argument
    verify value of evidence
    recognize subjectivity
* Adapted from: Bloom, B.S. (Ed.) (1956) Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain. New York ; Toronto: Longmans, Green.
Writing Objectives

Behavioral Objective Defined

Objectives are precise statements of what students will learn as a result of exploring the knowledge map. Three reasons for designing Webquest objectives are:

1) they provide a sound basis for the selection of course content
2) they give the student an opportunity to explore various content hyperlinks
3) they provide a way to measure whether the learning has been attained


Objectives provide a frame-work enabling the map designer to select and organize the instructional content and evaluate a project. Write objectives in behavioral terms, including an action verb, a subject content reference, and/or an optimal level of achievement or degree of performance. Objectives should correlate to content standards developed by the academic departments, school districts, and/or State (State Departments of Education).

Links:
Tips for writing Objectives
Writing Objectives
Understanding Objectives

How to Write Objectives

WebQuests are based on the ideas of inquiry, constructivism, and cooperative and collaborative learning

Why WebQuests? (Tom March)

If you've attended any professional growth in-services or college of education courses in the past ten years you'll be familiar with the following phrases of teacher-speak: critical thinking, cooperative learning, authentic assessment, and technology integration. You may even have bumped into cognitive psychology with its schema theory, scaffolding, and novice/expert models. How about constructivism? If you're like most educators, you get excited about new ideas for helping students learn and grow, but then feel your chest tighten or your spirits sink when you remember your already bursting curriculum requirements and the logistical demands of classroom teaching. With everything else that must be taught, how can we add these new and important strategies? WebQuests were designed to address this dilemma by bringing together the most effective instructional practices into one integrated student activity.

Student Motivation & Authenticity

When students are motivated they not only put in more effort, but their minds are more alert and ready to make connections. WebQuests use several strategies to increase student motivation. First, WebQuests use a central question that honestly needs answering. When students are asked to understand, hypothesize or problem-solve an issue that confronts the real world, they face an authentic task, not something that only carries meaning in a school classroom. Although you can't count on getting a response, when students do receive feedback from someone they didn't previously know, they join a community of learners and have their presence, if not their contribution, validated. When teachers choose a topic they know their students would respond to, they add to the relevance.

The second feature of WebQuests that increase student motivation is that students are given real resources to work with. Rather than turn to a dated textbook, filtered encyclopedias or middle-of-the-road magazines, with the Web students can directly access individual experts, searchable databases, current reporting, and even fringe groups to gather their insights.

When students take on roles within a cooperative group, they must develop expertise on a particular aspect or perspective of the topic. That their teammates count on them to bring back real expertise should inspire and motivate learning.

Lastly, the answer or solution the student teams develop can be posted, emailed or presented to real people for feedback and evaluation. This authentic assessment also motivates students to do their best and come up with a real group answer, not simply something to fulfill an assignment.

Developing Thinking Skills

One of the main (and often neglected) features of any WebQuest is that students tackle questions that prompt higher level thinking. Certainly, the Web can be used as a source for simple information retrieval, but this misses its power and short-changes students. Built into the WebQuest process are the strategies of cognitive psychology and constructivism. First, the question posed to students can not be answered simply by collecting and spitting back information. A WebQuest forces students to transform information into something else: a cluster that maps out the main issues, a comparison, a hypothesis, a solution, etc.

In order to engage students in higher level cognition, WebQuests use scaffolding or prompting which has been shown to facilitate more advanced thinking. In other words, by breaking the task into meaningful "chunks" and asking students to undertake specific sub-tasks, a WebQuest can step them through the kind of thinking process that more expert learners would typically use.

Constructivism

Constructivism suggests that when students need to understand a more complex or sophisticated topic like those that comprise WebQuests, it doesn't help to serve them simplified truths, boiled down examples, or step-by-step formulas. What they need are many examples with lots of information and opinions on the topic through which they will sift until they have constructed an understanding that not only connects to their own individual prior knowledge, but also builds new schema that will be refined when students encounter the topic again in the future. Until the Web, this kind of activity was very difficult for the average teacher to create because collecting such a breadth of resources was next to impossible.

Cooperative Learning

In WebQuests students take on roles within a small student group and this tends to promote motivation. In addition, because the WebQuest targets learning about large, complex or controversial topics, it's probably not realistic to expect each student to master all of its aspects. Thus learners divide to conquer. This is not to say that students don't gain the overall understanding, because this happens in a later stage of the process, but it does suggest to learners the reality that not everyone knows everything. In fact, this is one of the great messages that students invariably bring back from interactions with experts whose works focus on very thin slivers of the knowledge pie. Having students develop expertise and be appreciated for it by their peers is built into each WebQuest. Cooperative learning strategies are then applied to necessitate each student's input. By running several WebQuest groups in the same class, students will also see that different solutions were chosen by each team because of the quality of the group members' research and argumentation skills. As students complete more WebQuests they will become increasingly aware that their individual work has a direct impact of the intelligence of their group's final product.



top